LogoLogo
Regen Registry Guide
Public Comment - Upcoming Methods
Public Comment - Upcoming Methods
  • Regen Registry Methodology Library
  • Published Methodologies
    • CarbonPlus Methodology for Grazing Systems v1.0 & Credit Class
    • Appendix: In-Stand Surface Application of Biochar in Forestlands Methodology
    • Methodology for Grazing in Vineyard Systems, v1.0
    • Soil Organic Carbon Estimation in Regenerative Cropping & Managed Grassland Ecosystems
    • Watershed Nature-Based and Green Infrastructure Water Methodology
    • ERA Brazil Methodology for Biodiversity Stewardship Credit
  • Methodologies Coming Soon
  • Methodologies and Credit Class Open for Public Comment
    • Call for Public Comment
      • Methodologies and Credit Classes Open for Public Comment
        • Ecometric Updated Methodology Proposal for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation in Regenerative v 1.2.2
Powered by GitBook
On this page
Export as PDF
  1. Published Methodologies

Soil Organic Carbon Estimation in Regenerative Cropping & Managed Grassland Ecosystems

PreviousMethodology for Grazing in Vineyard Systems, v1.0NextWatershed Nature-Based and Green Infrastructure Water Methodology

Last updated 11 months ago

CtrlK
  • Overview
  • Summary of Methodology Update:
  • Updated Version:
  • Document History

Overview

Developer: ecometric

Sectoral Scope: Carbon Removal

Abstract:

This methodology protocol proposes the use of remotely sensed multispectral imagery and soil sample results to train an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to monitor changes in Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) stocks, within a project area, through time. The project area will be defined in the credit class document. The SOC change will be reported as CO2 equivalent. SOC is crucial to soil health, fertility and ecosystem services including food production, making its preservation and restoration essential. This methodology will concentrate on the assessment of SOC sequestration as a major soil health characteristic, consisting of:

  1. SOC stocks.

  2. CO2 equivalents (CO2e)

Soil contains approximately 2344 Gt of organic carbon globally and is the largest terrestrial pool of organic carbon (Stockmann et al., 2013). Small changes in the soil organic carbon stock could result in significant impacts on the atmospheric carbon concentration. By monitoring the carbon levels in the soil, farmers and landowners will be able to measure the impact of their stewardship.

Summary of Methodology Update:

Update V1.2.2 of the ecometric Methodology for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation in Regenerative Cropping and Managed Grassland Ecosystems proposes the following changes:

  • The inclusion of Loss on Ignition laboratory test in geographies where there is no regional availability of DUMAS testing.

  • Using a sampling simulation based on the estimated SOC value range within a Project Area to calculate and report sampling uncertainty for a range of Compact Geographic Stratification strata sizes, for each monitoring round. This tool will be used to balance sampling uncertainty with sampling cost on large project areas and to transparently report the uncertainty associated with the selected sampling density for verifiers and auditors.

Updated Version:

591KB
Ecometric Methodology Update ID0044 V1.2.2_Final.pdf
pdf

Document History

Initial Submission

Methodology Proposal for Soil Organic Carbon Estimation in Regenerative Cropping and Managed Grasslands Ecosystems

548KB
Ecometric Methodology Proposal Doc ID 0038 Pre-Internal Review Original.pdf
pdf
Submission Date: July 3, 2022

Regen Registry Internal Review

Reviewers: Gisel Booman, Ned Horning

Date: August 1, 2022

Review Documents

Internal Review Feedback

110KB
Ecometric_Methodology Internal Review Feedback_Round 1.pdf
pdf

Internal Review Revision Report

191KB
Ecometric_Internal Review_R1_Comment Revision Report_PC Copy.pdf
pdf
Approval Date: August 1, 2022

Post Internal Review Markup

459KB
Ecometric Methodology Proposal Doc ID 0041 Post Internal Review Round 1 Markup Response.pdf
pdf

Regen Registry Internal Review

Reviewers: Gisel Booman, Ned Horning

Date: August 29, 2022

Review Documents

Round 2 Version for Review

401KB
Ecometric Methodology Proposal Doc ID 0041 Post-Internal Review Round 1_Start of Round 2.pdf
pdf

Internal Review Feedback

111KB
Ecometric - Methodology Internal Review Feedback - Round 2_PC Copy.pdf
pdf

Internal Review Revision Report

99KB
Ecometric_Internal Review_R2_Comment Revision Report_PC Copy.pdf
pdf

Additional Comments from Internal Review Process

76KB
Additional Comments from Ecometric Internal Review.pdf
pdf

Round 2 Final Version

429KB
Ecometric Methodology Proposal Doc ID 0042 Post-Internal Review Round 2.pdf
pdf

Expert Peer Review

Reviewers: Stuart Marsh, PhD, Apostolos Papadopoulos, PhD

Review Date: November, 2022

Review Documents:

Final Edits Round 2 Comparison to Expert Review Draft

460KB
Comparison V0043 with V0044 Expert Peer Review Comment Markup.pdf
pdf

Draft Submitted for Expert Peer Review

400KB
Ecometric Methodology Proposal Doc ID 0043 Final_Pre-External Expert Peer Review.pdf
pdf
Submission Date: November 1, 2022

Dr Stuart Marsh - Expert Peer Review Feedback Form

135KB
Ecometric Methodology Expert Peer Review Comments & Revisions_Marsh_1.0.docx.pdf
pdf

Dr Apostolos Papadopoulos - Expert Peer Review Feedback Form

130KB
Ecometric Methodology Expert Peer Review Comments & Revisions_Dr Papadopoulos_1.0.docx.pdf
pdf
Submission Date: November 22, 2022

Final Version

560KB
Ecometric Methodology Proposal Doc ID 0044_Final_Post-External Peer Review.pdf
pdf

Updated Version 2024 -Tracked Changes :

619KB
Ecometric Methodology Update_ID0044 V1.2.2_Tracked.pdf
pdf

Internal Review:

123KB
Ecometric - Methodology Update Internal Review May 10 - June11.docx.pdf
pdf

#138:

Change request updated 4 months ago